Showing posts with label Michelle Rodriguez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michelle Rodriguez. Show all posts

Friday, October 18, 2013

Machete Kills (2013)

I was a huge fan of Robert Rodriguez's "Machete" - a tour de force of exploding heads and grindhouse sleaze which featured enough crazy cameos of actors you can't believe are actually in it and enough catastrophic levels of ridiculous violence that it was impossible for me to not be entertained beyond what one would normally imagine to be possible. Yeah it was stupid, yeah it was so over-the-top that it curved around to be subterranean and yeah it was basically a live-action cartoon, but dammit there was a scene with Danny Trejo cutting a dude's stomach open, ripping out his intestines and using them to repel down a wall. Are you not entertained?

So it was with great anticipation that I sallied forth to enjoy another round of hopefully absurd carnage with "Machete Kills," a title which I approve of, but really feel should have an exclamation point at the end of it. In particular I was excited to see Charlie Sheen as the POTUS which, even though it's probably about a year too late to jump on the bandwagon it probably started on, is an idea so stupid that it has to be awesome. Remember, before he lost his mind Charlie Sheen was also something called "an actor," and he was pretty good at it. Hell, he's a funny guy. Remember "Hot Shots Part Deux?" That's good stuff

What I ended up getting with "Machete Kills" was something that was comforting like putting on a pair of warm slippers after you come inside from the cold. The same level of not-serious-take is still as loudly present as it was before, if not even more so, and it still features ridiculous levels of blood and guts that would be horrifying were they not so tongue in cheek. Danny Trejo is still the same steel-faced, indestructible superhero whose power is that he's an action movie star and simply cannot be killed. The recognizable cameos are still prevalent and bring a smile to my face. This is a good time, and it felt good.

Spaaaaaace kniiiiiiiiiife!!!

On the other hand, the slippers that we are slipping into have also been chewed up by your puppy. "Machete Kills" is not, and I hate to say this, a very good movie. I don't mean that from a snobby perspective, I mean that from the perspective of how well it does what it's trying to do. It must be said that it's just not as well executed as the original was, so from that perspective it is a let down. Like the puppy it's hard to be too upset at it, since it's so adorable and you knew it didn't mean any harm, but you just can't help but be kind of irritated. And it's not that you're mad. You're just disappointed.

"Those were my best zapatos, cabron."

Here's the thing. "Machete Kills" did one thing wrong that really should not have been an issue, and I would have honestly thought would have been an impossibility before I saw it: It doesn't kill enough. I feel like such a clod saying that, but when you've built a franchise and a character on the sole premise of being a walking death machine who cannot die, than what you do is jam an hour and a half with him killing as many thing as you possibly can. That's what the first one did, and it was amazing.

What you DON'T do is put him in a situation where Danny Trejo spends most of the movie sitting down in chairs or standing around as he has various people talk at him as they brief him on his mission or monologue at him in villainous overtones. The fact that the majority of the time Danny Trejo spends between these little meetings is simply walking around from place to place without much incident besides the occasional badass quip doesn't help.

Unfortunately this is what most of "Machete Kills" ends up being. It's just Machete walking around doing stuff. He's not even doing anything overly violent most of the time. He's not even talking most of the time since everybody else in the film does all the talking for him. That's fine since he's a Mexican of few words, but you get the impression that Danny Trejo may as well have had a camera mounted in his torso and was walking around Hollywood to get everybody's audition tapes as they tried out to be cast in Bond 24.

You know, I can hear her delivering "Why can't you be a good boy and die?" pretty well.

And right there is the best way to describe what "Machete Kills" feels like: It's a Bond movie. Or at least it's a Bond movie if it crossed over with "Dolemite," "Shaft" and something starring Pierre Kirby and then became Mexican. I know that sounds amazing, but when you factor in the plot the closest match for the Bond movie would be "Moonraker."

Speaking of which, the plot this time finds Machete sent on a mission by the POTUS to stop a Mexican drug lord (Demian Bichir) from blowing up Washington D.C. There's a lot of twisting and turning within the plot, far too much so if I'm being totally honest, but eventually this all leads to our real villain, Voz (Mel Gibson), an eccentric billionaire who has been kidnapping hundreds of Mexicans in order to get labor to complete his secret space station, which he and his race of super-people will live on while he wipes the rest of humanity out.

Like I said - Freaking "Moonraker."

Okay, fine. It's "Moonraker" with Mexicans. I can deal with that. At least Roger Moore isn't here, although that would be kind of awesome. The real issue though is that there's simply not enough action going on in between everything, and the boredom starts kicking in pretty quickly once it become clear that "Machete Kills" is trying to be something other than a shooting gallery. Normally I'd appalled a film for having a plot, but a movie like "Machete Kills" should only have exposition while it runs as fast as it can towards the next bloodbath. When they slow it down with too much plot it only makes it so that the absurdity, ie - the reason we're here, is dialed down a bit. They needed to go all out with this movie, and they really didn't. It pulled back from the peaks of zany that "Machete" reached.

And that's too bad because the violence that is there, inexcusable prevalence of CGI gore aside, is really good. There are some truly cringe-worthy moments here that are so insane that you can't help but laugh and slap your knees at the madness of it all. And anyone who doesn't get the joke of the over-the-top nature of it, or decries it as nothing but a pile of entrails with no point (as I read other reviewers mention to my bewilderment) is simply not speaking the same language. Come on, this is a movie that features a gun that literally turns people inside out. There is no way anyone with a brain-stem can't realize that it is meant to be laughed at. Don't judge from the same perspective as "Pulp Fiction." This is a comedy, for crying out loud. And it does that part well.

All that aside, the cast does make for an entertaining sit. It's like a revolving door of actors who grace the film with their presence before moving on. Mel Gibson threatens to steal the show as the "Star Wars" obsessed precogniscent villain, and plays the role with such glee and fun that it's a wonder he's not played bad guys more often. (Hello, "Expendables 3" ^_^) However my particular favorite was La Camaleón, a disguise shifting assassin played in turn by Walter Goggins, Cuba Gooding Jr., Lady Gaga and Antonio Banderas. That character was just too cool. And any movie that puts a bullet in Jessica Alba's dome in the first five minutes is doing something right.

 That's not to mention President Sheen slamming back whiskeys and dropping profanity laced tirades like he's a hard-boiled police sergeant in a film noire. It's pretty amazing.

So yeah, it's not a good as "Machete." But it wasn't bad, I guess. I was a good time. Now we can only hope that they go ahead and fulfill their promise with that trailer and tease of a non-ending for "Machete Kills Again...In Space." Honestly, showing the trailer for that at the beginning of "Machete Kills" was probably the worst thing they could have done. That movie looked way better. THAT'S the level of ridiculousness we wanted! Damn it, why couldn't they have skipped this one and gone right to that?

You know, the trailer is making me want to watch it again, though.

THE BOTTOM LINE - "Machete Kills" is an okay movie if you liked the first one. It's not nearly as good because it's trying to have too much plot, which bogs the pace and acts of carnage down to unacceptable levels. The bits that are in there that are good are great, but you've got to slog through too much not-as-awesome to get there. The cast makes it worth watching, though.

Friday, January 4, 2013

Resident Evil: Retribution (2012)

Sure. Why the hell not? I've seen all the other "Resident Evil" films. I guess I'll watch this one. But it's not like it's going to make a difference one way or the other. This will suck just like the rest.

There comes a point when watching video game movies that I just have to wonder what in the hell the people making these films are doing. It can't be that hard to make a film out of these things. Just play the damn game, write down what happens and you've got your script. Easiest thing ever, right? All the hard work is done for you. Why the makers of the "Resident Evil" films thought that the thing a horror game about crippling tension and nerve shattering atmosphere was missing was wire-fu and Milla Jovovich with super-powers is beyond me, but then again I'm not a professional. I'm just a guy who played the damn game. What do I know?

Then again, the plot to the "Resident Evil" games did get titanically stupid and impossible to follow really quick, and to be honest they kinda suck too. So I guess they've got me there. Whatever, I know how this works. Just start with the endless waves of zombies getting shot, Albert Wesker being a huge ham, me not having the slightest clue what's going on and Milla Jovovich being strategically almost naked. Let's get this over with. I've got places to be.

Okay. I'll bite. Why did they dress you in a sheet of parchment paper? What possible purpose does that serve? Keeping you warm? Or are you dressed up for Halloween as a sexy piece of loose-leaf?

We begin "Resident Evil: Retribution" with...*sigh*...okay wait. I got something to say before we go any further. You ready for this? It's the first review of 2013, and I'm already about to once again drop some funky fresh science.

It's time for "LESSONS WITH PROFESSOR PAT"

Pictured above - A man with a mustache.

LESSON #75 - "Try harder at movie titles!"

There are several ways to go about naming sequels to films. The easiest, most logical method is obviously numbering them in chronological order. This is rare. If you do this, you are awesome. Everyone knows the order of the films without any question, and they can easily discuss them without having to add qualifiers to differentiate between films. Most people end up doing this anyway, even if the movies aren't numbered (eg - People refer to "Rocky Balboa" as "Rocky 6" because it makes sense, damn it.)

If, on the other hand, you use one of the inexcusably abused and worn out verb-ish sounding nouns to throw on the end of your film's title that sound epic but ultimately mean nothing such as Revolution, Revelations, Extinction, Retribution, Salvation, Apocalypse, The Beginning, or The Revenge, you suck and need to try harder. Extraordinarily rarely do these words have anything to do with the movie they are attached to, and all it does is to make me assume right out of the gate that it will suck. If it's called "Revolution" have a damn revolution in it. If it's called "Extinction" or "Apocalypse" everything had better die at the end. "The Beginning" had better not EVER have another movie set before it. Somebody better get saved in "Salvation." And "Revelations" had damn well better reveal a LOT of stuff.

If not, you're just throwing on a cliched, dumb word at the end like a lazy bastard that doesn't care. And if you can't be bothered to even think up a decent title, what hope does the rest of the film have?

/science drop

Back to the movie. "Retribution" finds us moving backwards as the entire opening scene, where Umbrella attacks the cargo vessel Alice (Milla Jovovich) is on, is played in slow-motion reverse during the opening credits. While it's interesting seeing explosions and people being shot in that way, it gets old pretty quick and is confusing. This is especially so when get to "the end" of the scene, when it then plays the entire scene again forward at normal speed. Why they do this I have no idea. I'm sure it was just a gimmick to use for the 3D in the theaters. Glad I'm watching it on my TV in 2D. Really makes it pop.

Wow. It's like I'm right there.

After that thoroughly confusing debacle we find Alice in suburbia reenacting the opening of the remake of "Dawn of The Dead." While it's nice to see "Resident Evil" finally look like a zombie film after five freaking movies, it's clear that everything is not what it seems and it won't last, as Alice has a husband and daughter, and Rain (Michelle Rodriguez) is now alive after being dead since the first one.

Sure enough, Alice "dies" and we find out it's all a simulation or that was a clone or both or neither or something and there's a deaf kid and I have no idea what's going on here in this damn movie. Alice wakes up (strategically naked, naturally) in a white room where this disembodied voice keeps asking her questions and then hurting her with sound when she doesn't answer, but after a while they just let her go and give her leather bondage clothes which just happen to be there in a hidden compartment in the white room for some reason. I guess it's for the same reason the scientists in "Underworld Awakening" kept Kate Beckinsale's clothes right next to her tube even though they never intended to release her. Ever. Whatever. Alice then shoots zombies.

Lots of zombies.

It's all another simulation, of course. Kind of. Not really. Alice is actually in an underwater Umbrella facility in the Arctic which was made to showcase...something? Wesker's hologram explains at one point that it was made to play the world's superpowers off against each other, as there are several "stages" including Moscow and Suburbia USA and Tokyo, which are meant to show how effective a zombie outbreak would be in totally wrecking the place in the hopes that country would then buy the virus from them. Personally I think that seems like a colossal waste of time and money to spend on a huge facility which exists only to make probably about as much money as it cost to make the damn thing in the first place. Also, correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Umbrella just release the virus anyway?

And another thing. Why does an EEEEEEEVAL corporation like Umbrella, which is seemingly bent on destroying the world at all interested in money? They've killed nearly everyone on Earth. Who's there to control with that money and power? It's like stockpiling devices that will place pandas under your command and calling yourself Supreme Master of The Panda Empire. There's less than 2,000 of them left on the planet. Who cares?

Out of nowhere we get characters from the games appearing to infiltrate the base and I think rescue Alice. I'm not sure, actually. My memory for these movies is so bad, and I'm so lost as to the plot that I can't even remember if characters like Barry and Leon and Ada were even in the other films. And frankly I don't care. Whatever. Zombies carry guns now, there's a really big monster chasing them, Barry has an annoying face and Leon looks like one of the nihilists from "The Big Lebowski."

God, I wish I was watching "Logjammin'" right now.

It's really amazing that I have absolutely no idea what's going on when every single line of dialogue in this movie is exposition. It's not enough to show us anything, because we don't know what anything is here. No, everything needs to be explained to us as well, by characters who already know what they're looking at and would never need to say anything about it. And yet, despite all of that clunky dialogue, it's still a useless nightmare piecing anything together. It's a testament to how insanely convoluted this plot is, and how intimate your knowledge of these games with even more convoluted plots needs to be in order to understand anything. It reminded me of "The Last Airbender" in that way.

It's really best to not even better with making sense of anything. Just watch Milla and a bunch of other dudes with big guns shoot things. And does "Retribution" do that well? I guess so. It's nothing overly special but I can't say it didn't deliver in terms of making the heads of various things explode with bullets. So I guess in those terms you can't call it a total wash.

It also feels more like an actual video game than the other films did as the base feels like a variety of stages to get through, which while normally a point in a video game movie's favor is something of a detriment since it really drives home the point that there really isn't much holding this thing together besides advancing to "the next level." On the other hand, the end feels like a movie since it is purely Hollywood sequel-baiting. I love how movies like this can never have a self-contained ending.

Take all that for what it's worth. If you want a bunch of zombies getting shot up, sure. Watch "Resident Evil: Retribution." There's so much better movies for that, though. Right off the top of my head I could say "28 Weeks Later." However, that film didn't have a scene were Milla Jovovich has to show Michelle Rodriguez how to use a gun. That was pathetically funny. Michelle could be armed with a banana and come off as more of a hardass than Milla could.

Also, someone needs to tell Milla to work on her upper body strength so those guns don't shake when she lifts them. Come on.

And who the hell got any Retribution in this thing? It should have been called "Resident Evil: Escape." THAT would have made some sense.

THE BOTTOM LINE - There aren't too many positive things I have to say about "Resident Evil: Retribution" except to say that it's better than the second and third films. It's got some decent action, the sets are sometimes creative and neat, and there's some interesting visual designs going on with the settings. Other than that it's just a forgettable action movie with characters impossible to care about. Unless you're a big fan of the others, in which case it will probably be decently entertaining.