2012 was a year of great expectations. I had predicted that after the tepid offerings of 2011, the blockbusters scheduled for this year had the potential to be fantastic. And thankfully that turned out to (mostly) be the case. There were few big titles that disappointed, which was a nice change of pace.
On the other hand, that means that this year's list is going to contain fewer than the normal amount of weird, smaller movies nobody had heard of, something that I usually take pride in. I swear it's not on purpose, but between the big movies actually being decent for a change, combined with the fact that my overall movie consumption is less than usual for this year since this blog keeps me from devouring everything on the shelf like I normally do, I'm guessing most people have at least heard of the majority of these films.
Sorry, I'll try to be snootier in the coming year. It's a promise. On with the Top 10 Best Movies of 2012! (plus an honorable mention)
Honorable Mention: Brave
Pixar's latest effort caught me off guard with a movie I actually really liked a lot. I found the characters and story far more likable than their average fare, and I had a very good time with it despite myself. I'm still not a huge fan of Pixar, but I always give credit where I feel credit is due. "Brave" is probably my new favorite Pixar film.
And once again, I must commend "Brave" for having a fairy tale story about a young girl which doesn't feature a love interest at any point. I can't describe how refreshing that is.
10. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
I'm not going to lie to you. "The Hobbit" is going on this list purely out of fanboyism. I can't help myself. Was it a great movie on par with "The Lord of The Rings" films? No. Did that matter? Not to me. It's still "The Hobbit." And I am such a huge mark for it that there's no way I'm not loving every bit of it.
Look, I won't blow smoke up your collective asses and be dishonest. This movie had its issues. The biggest thing being the fact that it's an hour too long for no good reason. Had that been fixed it would have been WAY higher on the list. But despite my nerd-love for "The Hobbit," I can't bring myself to place it higher. There are just too many problems with the pacing. But it was still awesome despite all of those problems, and it still deserves a spot on my Top 10 of 2012.
Now, just wait until "The Desolation of Smaug" and we're talking guaranteed Top 3 spots! At least. I'm calling it right now. That movie...you just have no idea how awesome it's going to be.
9. The Flowers of War
This is the only movie on this list that I can't say I had a fun time at. "The Flowers of War" is a slog to get through. It's rough. It's brutal. Horrible, awful, unthinkable, "Schindler's List" level, tear-inducing things happen in this film. It's enough to make you cry. It's enough to make you not want to watch anymore. It's enough to make you want to retch. And my goodness was it amazing.
This isn't lite watching by any means. But if you can stomach it, and I recommend you do, you'll understand why it made my Best of The Year list. It deserves it. Any movie that is that powerful and moving is doing a lot of things right. Even if those things aren't things you'd ever, ever want to see. The scenes from "The Flowers of War" that have been burned into my mind are never going to leave. I can't say I would have willingly chosen to have them there, but I'm glad I saw such moving images that left such a strong impression.
8, Wreck-It Ralph
One
of the bigger surprises for me this year came in the form of John C.
Reilly as a video game character in "Wreck-It Ralph." I wasn't holding
out high hopes for this one, but it ended up being both charming, well
written, very entertaining and funny as hell. Much like "Bolt," another
film from Walt Disney Animation Studios that I really like, "Wreck-It
Ralph" also managed to be touching and heartbreaking at times without
ever feeling like we were being overtly manipulated into it. On top of
everything else, it's also a gorgeous flick.
Also,
having been a gamer for many a year, this was a nostalgic kick to the
spine that dropped references that only 30-somes like me would get. I
mean, when's the last time you saw a "Metal Gear Solid" reference in a
movie? I love when stuff is catered towards me!
7. The Grey
This tale of Liam Neeson in the woods trying to save himself and a small group of plane crash survivors from a vicious, extremely territorial pack of wolves in Alaska was part "Heart of Darkness," part "Alive" (only good) and part "Jaws." It's also a moving tale of courage and personal strength in the face of overwhelming odds and crippling despair.
Is it even possible to survive something like this? Probably not. Is the fight worth it? Maybe. Is that the point? No. Will it mean everything if you look despair in the eye, spit at its feet and sneer "Do your worst, you son of a bitch" even while standing on the edge of the cliff? Absolutely.
6. Skyfall
After
the crushing disappointment that was "Quantum of Solace," the odds were
not in Bond's favor with "Skyfall." Leave it to Sam Mendes to bring
Bond back to the forefront of ass-kicking with what was the most
ass-kickingist Bond movie since Pierce Brosnan's debut in "GoldenEye."
"Skyfall"
was a grand-slam-in-the-bottom-of-the-9th success in every way that I
can think of. Even the last half hour, which I thought did the film a
disservice by going more Jason Bourne than James Bond was still awesome,
despite my complaints. We also got the first memorable villain since
"GoldenEye" with Javier Bardem, playing the only Bond villain that I can
recall seeming like he was threatening to sexually molest 007. It was a
fun time.
This is just what the Bond franchise needed. Now they need to do exactly that again. Forever.
5. Looper
Like
there's any way the best time travel movie I've seen since "12 Monkeys"
isn't going on this list. "Looper" is just as twisty-turney in the
genre it occupies at any given moment as the plot that it weaves, and twists and
turns it has a-plenty. What's amazing is that as often as it changes, so
drastically so that if you were to watch the beginning and the end
there's a good chance you'd think they were different films aside from
the cast, it never once doesn't make total sense or feel out of place.
If
there was a guy looking to take up the mantel of "The Next Christopher
Nolan," director Rian Johnson is it. I can't wait to see what he does
next. If "Looper" is any indication, whatever it is, it's going to blow our minds.
4. The Dark Knight Rises
The
final chapter in Christopher Nolan's superb Batman trilogy was a movie
that was met with some, let's be gentle and say "mixed" reactions. In
actuality it was closer to "half the audience loved it and the other
half wanted to burn down Hollywood over it." It's always normal to have
backlash to any highly anticipated movie, but people seemed really
viciously torn over this one. I don't understand why because I thought
"The Dark Knight Rises" was a towering, powerful end to one of my
favorite film series. I loved it, despite some problems with pacing,
which is why it isn't higher on the list.
This film was a big bite out of a huge sandwich, maybe a little too big
to be sure, and there's a lot to chew. There's a lot of character stuff
going on, and it's less about Batman than it is Gotham as a whole. But
that didn't seem out of place to me. Gotham has always been what Batman
was fighting for the whole time. And thematically it's appropriate since
a large aspect of the story is dealing with how the people of Gotham
are going to function without Batman. You think Bruce Wayne wanted to
have to protect Gotham forever? No, he wanted them to not have to need
him. This isn't Batman being pushed out of the picture, this is his
story coming full circle. This was the point this whole time, if you
care to pay attention to the two films that came before.
And
I don't care what you say. Bane was amazing. And I understood him
perfectly fine. Ya'll need your hearing checked. Or maybe go to a
theater with decent sound.
How did it come to this? Here we stand, at the turn of the tide. We now come to the TOP 3 OF 2012. In a year of much anticipation, there were some ups and there were some downs - but which 3 films were solid enough to make the upper echelon? One had me doing one of the biggest nerd-outs I've ever done over it, another I just assumed was going to be incredible (and I was right), while another was actually a complete surprise. Which ones? Let's do it! Here's what I consider the absolute best of what 2012 had to offer!
3. Prometheus
Few movies this year, well besides TDKR, was as divisive as "Prometheus" was. Ridley Scott's return to sci-fi was met with high expectations and intense backlash as it turned out to be, to the OUTRAGE of fans of the "Alien" franchise, something that was unthinkable! It was...brace yourselves, children...
A SCIENCE FICTION MOVIE.
Gasp! Do you mean to tell me that Ridley Scott had the temerity to make a film with huge, bold ideas that may not have any easy answers, which takes its time in actually setting up an atmosphere to portray and develop the futuristic world it takes place in, and has a grand sense of discovery and exploration, and leaves you with more questions than answers, in other words "great science fiction" instead of simply remaking "Aliens" and calling it a day?! What a travesty!
I seriously don't understand the rage that "Prometheus" inspired. I hate to sound like a snob (okay that's a lie) but honestly, if you're one of the people who hated "Prometheus," I seriously don't know what you were expecting. Was it "Alien?" If that's the case, you got it as the plot is essentially the same in its barest elements. Was it "Aliens?" Then just watch "Aliens." Don't tell me that's what you really wanted, either, because then you'd call it derivative. Did you just want "a sci-fi movie?" THAT'S WHAT YOU GOT. I hate to break this phrase out, but I have to assume the people complaining just didn't "get it." This movie is fantastic, and a wonderful, brainy addition to the "Alien" franchise. I can't wait to see where it goes next.
(And by the way, as to the complaint that the scientists "act stupid," all I have to say is "I'm the first person on an unexplored planet uncovering what may be the secret to not only how human life began, but I'm the first son of a bitch to encounter AN ALIEN GOD DAMN LIFEFORM. Quick! Let me hide in my room and not go anywhere, do anything, or perform any acts of exploration and discovery, or in other words why I came here." And remember, it's not like they know they're in a horror film.) I think this may deserve it's own entry on exploring the misdirected hate.
2. Django Unchained
Come on. It's freaking Quentin Tarantino. The man is the sugar to my Kool Aide. The vodka to my martini. The cheese to my Royale. You think he's not making an appearance on here? I'm not sure where I'd rank "Django Unchained" next to the rest of his films, since they all shine in their own way but still feel very similar, but it's up there among his best, I think. It's probably his most streamlined, least self-indulgent outing, which may relieve most and disappoint a select few others. At least, it certainly flies by faster than the others despite being the longest movie he's made at nearly 3 hours.
Tarantino always populates his movies with the most incredible cast you can imagine, and here is no different. Seeing Christoph Waltz give another Oscar nomination assured performance was no surprise, but what was a surprise was seeing Leonardo DiCaprio actually stealing the show from Waltz to give what I thought was easily the performance of his career. While everyone in "Django Unchained" was a superstar, both of these guys made it worth seeing by themselves. Easily.
And that's without the rest of the movie being a solid-gold home run. Which it was.
And the best movie I saw in 2012 was...
1. ParaNorman
Much
like "The Muppets" last year and "Coraline" in 2009, my top film of the
year ended up being the one that made me feel the best. "ParaNorman" is
a loving tribute to horror and bloody exploitation grindhouse films,
while maintaining a PG rating and a charming sense of humor. Shockingly,
this works in a fantastic fashion.
Putting an
ear-to-ear smile on my face for an hour and a half is not an easy task. I
am a notorious sourpuss when it comes to most movies. "ParaNorman,"
though, this was all smiles from beginning to end. Well, smiles except
when I was squirming in my seat going "EEEEEWWW!!! NO!!! HAHA!! OH NO!"
at a corpse licking someone, picking my jaw off the ground both during a
shockingly dark reveal at the end of the second act and a satisfyingly
intense climax, and pointing at the screen and laughing my fool head off
over the fact that there was a "Manos: The Hands of Fate" reference,
and other various things of that nature that made this film an absolute
delight.
I loved every second of "ParaNorman." It
would make a fantastic double-feature with "Coraline," which is an idea
so awesome that I may have to do that sometime soon. I still think
"Coraline" is the better film, but "ParaNorman" wins out on the humor.
But any movie I'm able to even put in the same sentence comparatively as
"Coraline" is one that is going to hold a special place for me forever,
because that's not something that happens often. Mostly it's relegated
to every time Laika does another stop-motion film.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go watch something where the zombie eats someone's brains...
Showing posts with label The Grey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Grey. Show all posts
Monday, December 31, 2012
Saturday, January 28, 2012
The Grey (2012)
Is it too early in the year to call that something is probably going to make my Top 10 of 2012? I hope not, but on the other hand, if there are 10 other movies that come out this year that are better than "The Grey," I'll just call myself a lucky S.O.B., and pat myself on the back because I called it back in December that 2012 is looking to be an unbelievably good year for movies. This my friends, is a good start, and the question "will 10 better films be made this year" is the kind of thing that makes me excited just thinking about.The thing I don't understand is why on Earth is Liam Neeson not huge? I'm talking Johnny Depp (but not annoying) huge. Mel Gibson (but before he went crazy) huge. Marlon Brando (but not fat) huge. I swear that this guy is the single most charismatic actor over 50 around right now, and I don't understand why he's not more popular than he already is. When you say "Liam Neeson" people usually respond, "Oh yeah, the guy from "Taken?" Yeah, he's pretty cool." That's not acceptable. Liam Neeson's name needs to be on the lips of every single person who watches movies, because he deserves it, and his name alone should be worth $200 million in the box office -- to start.
AND WHERE THE BLOODY HELL IS HIS OSCAR?! Do you have ANY idea how many amazing roles this guy's done? Only one nomination for "Schindler's List" back in 1993? Please. That's an insult to a guy who could take anyone in Hollywood to school. Give me a name. Liam's just as good, if not better. Sean Penn does NOT need another Oscar. Why don't they give it to the greatest actor to ever come out of Ireland? And while we're at it, give one to Sean Bean, too! He's runner-up!
Also, if he's not doing books on tape, he needs to. Listening to his voice is like having sex in your eardrums, it's unreal.
So what if I'm sporting a total man-crush on the dude? I apologize for nothing!
He's a dreamboat.
In "The Grey," Liam Neeson is a guy working for an oil pipeline in Alaska, and his job is to work like a sharpshooter, protecting workers from any wolves that may attack them. So when the plane he's on with a bunch of workers crashes in the Alaskan wilderness, right in the midst of a pack of killer wolves, it's probably a good thing he was along for the ride. At first it seems like it will be a survival movie, but it isn't long until the wolves show up, and from there it essentially becomes a slasher flick as the survivors get picked off one by one.
WASSUUUUUUUUUUP!!??!?!
It's a bloody movie, as one might expect. The violence is brutal and savage, and there were a couple moments that elicited a hardy "OH! DANG!" from me as somebody become a nice freshly made corpse. But it never came across as gratuitous, in my opinion. It's just that it's really effective. This isn't like Jason Voorhees thinking up new ways to creatively kill you with various pointy objects. They're wolves. They eat stuff. They kind of have a one track M.O.
To be fair, it was impossible to not nitpick it a little. "The Grey" does hit a bit of a speed-bump about halfway through when we get a lot of character background in a couple talky scenes. It's good stuff, but it kind of diffused the tension a bit since I'm thinking "Umm...have we forgotten about the wolves? You guys sure are chatty for people being hunted." Also, their survival technique may not have been the best. Why don't they ever attempt to build shelter? Why do they sit with their backs to the woods where the wolves are coming from? Why don't they climb a tree since wolves don't freaking climb? Where's Les Stroud when you need him?!
"Ya'll chill. I got this."
"The Grey" is a movie that should be stock. It should be an average, by the numbers story about survival that you've seen many times before. And at its core, it is. This is not an original or a groundbreaking story, but what makes "The Grey" shine is the way it is presented and told. By utilizing phenomenal camera-work and set design, the scene is set to show a very cold, harsh and brutal climate in which the characters are forced into, but the editing of the film, along with the moments when we enter Liam's head/subconscious, serve to place us in another world of almost surreal quality. The landscape is dangerous to begin with but with "The Grey" we may as well be on another planet. It's almost Aronofsky-esque, which is a HUGE compliment.
What will stick with me most about "The Grey" are the absolutely gorgeous shots that are some of the most striking visuals I've ever seen. The best among them include the first time the wolves appear. Coming in from the darkness, we see only one pair of glowing eyes at first, then another, and another, and before long they are filling the blackness beyond the dim torchlight. One of the survivors, unable to go one step more, sits down to die beside a river beside a sprawling Alaskan mountain range, and as the camera very slowly zooms in on the back of his head, as he silently contemplates the end, off in the distance is the very faint sounds of something coming for him from the woods. A crest of a hill at night as wolves howl from just beyond the ridge, with only their breath visible as it slowly rises up, and we can only guess at their numbers by the plumes of steam appearing.
O hai.
All of these scenes are just positively chilling to the core. I mean, when was the last time in a horror movie you knew the villain was coming because you saw their breath in the frigid, winter night air? Brrrrrrr! That's scary stuff!
And what's best about those scenes is that it showcases what I loved most about "The Grey," which was its subtlety. You don't need to see the wolves. You hear them. And since the film does enough with establishing the fact that they could be anywhere at any time, the tension is essentially never broken. It's like the shark in "Jaws." You didn't need to see the shark to know that it's out there in the water. And like "Jaws," this movie played its hand pretty close to the chest, and only pulled out the wolves for a good reason.
The sad part is that this is pretty standard stuff for a suspense film. These are not ancient secrets long buried and forgotten. This is film making 101, but so many movies like this would be far more upfront and obnoxious with hitting you over the head with either the gore or the "monsters" in fear of having the audience grow bored, and that's a bunch of crap. Just see the 2011 prequel to "The Thing" (actually, don't see it) for absolute proof that not having subtlety is absolute death for suspense. Otherwise you're banging pots and pans around going BWARGARBLRAGH!!!! And that's just annoying.
What's great about "The Grey" is that it's a movie that's not afraid to NOT show something, and let the audience fill in the blanks and do some work, which is far more effective in the long run. And that's what subtly is all about.
Pictured above: Taping knifes and broken bottles to your hands. In other words, a standard Irish wedding.
One thing that may annoy people is the ending. You know what? If you hate the ending, shut up. It's great. It ends on the absolute climax of the main character's emotions, at the end of his journey, the defining moment of his life, and not a second more is spilled over. In that way it's like the closing frame of the first "Rocky." It's a fantastic ending.
Once more into the fray...
Into the last good fight I'll ever know...
Live and die on this day...
Live and die on this day...
Into the last good fight I'll ever know...
Live and die on this day...
Live and die on this day...
That about says it all.
THE BOTTOM LINE: I was blown away by "The Grey." Unless 10 better films come along, this is making my Top 10 of 2012. Very Highly Recommended, although a liking of "different" movies will be helpful since it is slightly unconventional. Fans of Darren Aronofsky do not want to miss it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















